|CATHOLIC SAINTS INDEX||A||B||C||D||E||F||G||H||I||J||K||L||M||N||O||P||Q||R||S||T||U||V||W||X||Y||Z|
REV. J. A. CONNELLAN
'Why are there still separations? Why are there still schisms? Pope Pius XII
'Oh that this Holy Year could welcome also the great return to the one, true Church, awaited over the centuries of so many who, though believing in Jesus Christ, are for various reasons separated. . . .
'With good reason, men are anxious about the effrontery with which the united front of militant atheism advances. And the old question is now voiced aloud: 'Why are there still separations? Why are there still schisms? When will all the forces of the spirit and of love be harmoniously united? . . .
'If on other occasions an invitation to unity has been sent forth from this Apostolic See, on this occasion we repeat it more warmly and paternally. We feel that we are urged by the pleadings and prayers of numerous believers scattered over the whole earth who, after suffering tragic and painful events, turn their eyes towards this Apostolic See as toward an anchor of salvation for the whole world.
-(Pope Pius XII at inauguration of Holy Year, 1950.)
* * *
Christian Unity in God's Way
Protestant world conferences on the subject of Christian reunion held at Stockholm (1925), Lausanne (1927), Edinburgh (1937), and Amsterdam (1948) have expressed the growing realization amongst non-Catholic Christians of the urgent need for unity amongst all those who profess to be followers of Christ. The final statement drafted by the Committee at Edinburgh declared: 'We humbly acknowledge our divisions are contrary to the will of Christ, and we pray God for unity. And yet, all the conferences have achieved nothing of lasting value. Warring sects continue to multiply, all claiming to be Christian, all vigorously asserting that they teach what Christ taught, but contradicting one another on doctrines of fundamental importance and far-reaching consequences. During his recent visit to Australia, one of the Presidents of the World Council of Churches, Archbishop Fisher, Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury and head of the Church of England, declared his belief that there could not be reunion amongst Protestants at present.
Catholics believe that there can be no question at all of reunion of churches. The real Church of Christ has never been divided. Those who have broken away from union with Christ's Vicar on earth, the Pope, have established religious organizations contrary to the will of Christ and ceased to belong to the true Catholic Church. Unity can be secured only in one way-God's way-by entrance into that Society, the Catholic Church, which God Himself set up to bring men into union with Him.
Christ, Who was God, expressed very clearly His intention and His will that there should be but one Church: 'Other sheep I have that are not of this fold; them also I must bring and they shall hear My voice and there shall be one fold and one shepherd (John 10: 16). He had come into the world that men might know the truth: 'For this was I born and for that I came into the world, to give testimony to the truth (John 18: 37). 'I am the way, the truth and the life . . . he that follows Me, walks not in darkness. . . .I am the light of the world. . . .Come to Me all you that labour and are burdened and I will refresh you. If He Who is God considered it so important that men should know the truth that He would become man in order to teach men, suffer and die an agonizing death for the sake of men and rise from the dead to convince men of His divine authority, then it must be of the utmost importance that there should be no confusion and no doubt about what that teaching is and where it is to be found today.
Did Christ care very much what we believe? The very fact that He became man in order to teach answers clearly. But listen to His warning: 'He that believes and is baptized shall be saved; he that believes not shall be condemned (Mark 16: 16). He suffered the ignominy and agony of the death of the Cross rather than modify His teaching in the slightest degree to suit the prejudices of His enemies. He imposed the obligation on His Apostles of leaving home, of leaving all things, of exposing themselves to hatred, violence of every kind and certain death in order to carry on His work: 'I send you, He said, 'as sheep amongst wolves. . . 'Go into the whole world and preach the Gospel to every creature. They were given no liberty to teach one doctrine and reject another: 'teach them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you (Matt. 28: 20). He threatened with severest penalties those who refused to hear their teaching: 'And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words . . . shake off the dust from your feet. Amen, I say to you, it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrah in the day of judgement than for that city (Matt. 10: 14).
Provision for All
The truths taught by Christ were intended not only for the people of His own age, butfor all men in all ages: 'preach the gospel to every creature . . . go into the whole world. Christ cared not only for the people of His own day, but for you and for me. In all ages, men would need to find the way, the truth and the life. Is it likely that, after going to so much trouble, enduring so many hardships and finally giving His life for the truth, He would ever again allow His teaching to become obscured or uncertain? He was God with the power and the wisdom of God. He wanted His teaching preserved free from error to the very end of the world. He could and He did provide the means to ensure that it would be preserved: 'Heaven and earth shall pass away, but My word shall not pass away (Mark 13, 31).
'Through the Church, St. Paul tells us, 'is made known the manifold wisdom of God according to the eternal purpose which He made in Christ Jesus, our Lord (Ephes. 3: 10). Christ's way of safeguarding His teaching was to establish His Church, divinely commissioned and divinely guaranteed. He gathered around Him a small body of men, twelve apostles. For three years they lived with Him. They heard His teaching, saw His example, heard His prophecies, saw His miracles. They saw Him dead; they saw Him risen from the dead. They were to carry on His work: 'As the Father has sent Me, I also send you. They were to be the foundation members of a living, teaching authority which He called His Church: In Matthew 16: 18 He says 'Upon this rock I will build My Church. That Church was not a mere aggregation of men who discovered His teaching as best they could from the Bible-there was no New Testament then. It was an organized society of persons with a constitution and authority defined by Christ Himself in order to preserve and propagate His teaching and to administer special means of sanctification-a living organism rather than an organization; 'the Body of Christ.
Repeatedly Christ avowed His intention of establishing a kingdom. No less than 19 of His parables are on the subject of His kingdom on earth, His Church. This was His dearest work: 'Christ loved the Church, St. Paul tells us, 'and delivered Himself up for it (Ephes. 5: 25). Christ 'purchased the Church with His Blood (Acts 20: 28). He identified the Church with Himself. To Saul of Tarsus, 'breathing out threatenings and slaughter against the members of His infant Church, He said: 'Saul, Saul, why persecute you Me? (Acts 9: 4). It is the Body of Christ, Christ's way of teaching, directing and sanctifying all men inall ages: 'For as the body is one and has many members, St. Paul wrote to the Corinthians, 'and all the members of the body, whereas they are many, yet are one body, so also is Christ. For in one Spirit were we all baptized into one body. . . . Now you are the body of Christ (I Cor. 12: 12-27).
An Imperishable Church
He promised that His Church would last to the very end of the world. Though all the fury of hell might be let loose against His Church, it would never overthrow it: 'the gates of hell shall not prevail against it (Matt. 16: 18). He would safeguard it Himself: 'I am with you all days even to the consummation of the world (Matt. 28: 18). So would God, the Holy Ghost: 'He will teach you all truth and abide with you forever (John 14: 16).
The Church Infallible
1. Christ established the Church to carry on His work: 'As the Father has sent Me, I also send you. That work was to teach truth: 'For this was I born and for this I came into the world, to give testimony to the truth (John 18: 37).
2. So clearly would the Church teach what He taught that He couldsay: 'He that hears you hears Me; he that despises you despises Me (Luke 10: 16).
3.God the Holy Ghost would safeguard its teaching: 'He will teach you all truth and abide with you forever (John 14: 16).
4. Our Divine Lord bound all men to accept its teaching and threatened with severest penalties those who refused. He could not do that if it were capable of teaching error: 'He that believes not shall be condemned (Mark 16: 16). 'He that will not hear the Church, let him be to you as the heathen (Matt. 18: 17). 'And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words . . . shake off the dust from your feet. Amen, I say to you, it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrah in the day of judgement than for that city (Matt. 10: 14). Whatever excuse there might be for the immorality of Sodom and Gomorrah because of the weakness of human nature, there would be no excuse for failure to hear those who speak in Christ's name: 'he that despises you despises Me.
5. Christ promised that His teaching would always be safeguarded: 'Heaven and earth shall pass away but My word shall not pass away (Matt. 24: 35). The Church that represents Him will never misrepresent Him-it must be infallible.
6. St. Paul explains, as we have already seen, how the teaching of Christ is safeguarded 'through the Church (Ephes. 3: 10). 'The Church, he says, 'is the pillar and the ground of truth. (I Tim 3: 15)
7. The apostles themselves were so convinced of their God-given authority and protection that they could issue their decree after the first Council of Jerusalem with the words: 'It has seemed good to the Holy Ghost and to us (Acts 15: 28), and St. Paul could write to the Galatians: 'Even though an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel other than wehave preached, let him be anathema (Gal. 1: 8). Their teaching was not the teaching of men, nor even of angels, but the teaching of God Himself. They spoke. he said, 'not in the learned words of human wisdom, but in the doctrine of the Spirit (I Cor. 2: 13), for 'we have the mind of Christ (I Cor. 2: 16). St. John warns his readers: 'Whosoever revolts and continues not in the doctrine of Christ has not God. . . . If any man come unto you and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house (2 John 1: 10).
One Church Only
Repeatedly Christ insisted upon unity amongst His followers, absolute oneness of faith in one Church. 1. That Church He always speaks of as one, not many.
2. He calls it one family, one fold, one city, one kingdom.
3. 'Every kingdom divided against itself shall be made desolate and every city or house divided against itself shall not
stand (Mat. 12: 25)- but His Kingdom will last to the very end of time, therefore will not be divided. 4. 'Other sheep I have that are not of this fold; them also I must bring and they shall hear My voice and there shall be
one fold and one shepherd (John 10: 16)-notice where His voice is to be heard -in that one fold under one shepherd. 5. 'He that is not with Me is against Me (Matt. 12; 30) -wemust be one thing or the other. 'He that gathers not with
Me scatters-gathers, you see, into that one fold under one shepherd.
6. Perfect unity of faith amongst His followers is the subject of Christ's most earnest prayer on the eve of His passion:
'Holy Father, keep them in Your name whom You have given me; that they may be one as we also are . . . sanctify them
in truth. Your word is truth. . . . And for them do I sanctify myself, that they also may be sanctified in truth. And not for
them only do I pray, but for them also who through their word shall believe in Me. That they all may be one, as You Father in Me and I in You; that they also may be one in us that the world may believe that You have sent Me and have loved them as You have loved Me (John 17: 11-23). Notice the kind of unity they are to have-in truth: 'sanctify them in truth; and the degree of unity-perfect unity like the unity of God Himself: 'that they may be made perfect in one . . . as You Father in Me and I in You. This unity is to be the distinguishing characteristic by which men are to know where His teaching is to be found: 'that the world may believe that You have sent Me.
Chaos Outside True Church
7. St. Paul warns the Ephesians to be 'careful to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. One body and one Spirit as you are called in one hope of your calling. One Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all (Ephes. 4: 3). There is only one God; there must be only one religion.
8. He warns the Romans against tho se who would introduce new doctrines: 'Now I beseech you, brethren to mark them who make dissensions and offences contrary to the doctrine which you have learned and avoid them, for they that are such serve not Christ Our Lord (Rom. 16: 17).
9. He insists on perfect unity of mind and heart amongst the Corinthians: 'Now I beseech you brethren, by the name of Our Lord Jesus Christ, that you all speak the same thing and that there be no schisms among you, but that you may be perfect in the same mind and in the same judgement (1 Cor. 1: 10).
10. He explains why God has insisted on one body, the Church, and one body of teaching: 'that henceforth we be no more children tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the wickedness of men, by cunning craftiness by which they lie in wait to deceive (Ephes. 4: 14). Only in that one body have we perfect security; outside it, we are at the mercy of 'every wind of doctrine.
11. The Galatians he warns: 'if anyone preach to you a gospel besides that which you have received, let him be anathema (Gal. 1: 9).
Unity in God's Way
It must be clear that the unity intended by God was unity of faith. There can be no reunion save on that basis. Union with Christ is so close and so perfect in the Church which He established that St. Paul compares it to a body of which Christ is the head and we are the organs. If revelation is true, if God does speak through one Church only, then it is an insult not to listen; to disregard it is to disregard Almighty God.
Since Christ established one Church and one Church only, one religion is not as good as another -falsehood is not as good as truth, man-made theories are not as good as the infallible certainty of the teaching of God. There is one way and one way only of knowing the teaching of Christ-through the Church established by Christ to teach in His name and with His authority. To minimize or to exaggerate the teaching of Christ in any way, to compromise on matters of truth for the sake of convenient unity amongst men, would be treason to God and treachery to men. Our duty, then, is to find out which is the Church established by Christ and, having found it, to obey it as we would obey Christ Himself. Of that Church Christ has said: 'He that hears you hears Me; he that despises you despises Me (Luke 10: 16) . . .he that will not hear the Church, let him be to you as the heathen (Matt. 18: 17).
Four hundred or so years ago, the so-called Reformers split the unity of Christendom; they tore limbs from the Body of Christ. Christ had promised that the gates of hell would never prevail against His Church; the Reformers said, in effect, that it had. He promised to safeguard His Church to the very end of the world-they implied that He didn't. He gave an assurance that His teaching would never pass away-they said it had. Who are we to believe, God or men?
Whatever cause there might have been for a reformation, there was no justification for a revolution -and that is just what took place. No one doubts for a moment that there were evils and abuses amongst members of the Church at the time of the 'Reformation. The evils should have been removed, not other churches established by men. When you have dirt in your eye, you don't cut the eye out; you remove the dirt. If there was dirt in the Church, that should have been removed. The Reformers substituted a glass eye for the living eye provided by Christ Himself in order that men might be able to discern the truth.
Has Protestantism given men that sense of security and certainty that Christ meant them to have? Has it succeeded in securing that unity amongst Christ's followers upon which He and His apostles insisted so much? Has the 'Reformation really reformed anything, or has it led to thatdiversity of which St. Paul speaks where men will be 'tossed to and fro by every wind of doctrine? Look around and see the result. Compare the perfect unity of belief, worship and government of the Catholic Church with the utter lack of unity elsewhere. Hundreds of Protestant sects have now arisen and continue to multiply. Appealing to the Bible, one sect will claim that there is only one Person in God; others appeal to the same sacred text to prove that there are three. One will prove from the Bible that Christ was not God; others appeal to the same source to show that He is. One appeals to the authority of the Scripture to assert that Baptism of infants is not justified; others hold that it is. Four simple words: 'This is My Body, have been interpreted in over one hundred different ways. Even the authority of the Bible itself is doubted or denied by the descendants of those people who once regarded it as the only source of all revealed truth.
As time goes on, Protestantism continues to disintegrate and decompose until there is no particle of the original faith that is not denied. Each new day finds the Catholic Church growing in numbers, strengthened in unity and solidity, determined as ever to sacrifice all things rather than swerve from the duty she owes to her Divine Master of preaching the Gospel to every creature, of teaching them to observe all things whatsoever He has commanded. Which system looks like the one God would have established? Which looks like the work of men? Which looks like the system protected by God: 'I am with you all days? Where is the house founded on a rock? Which is built on shifting sand? Against which have the gates of hell not prevailed? Who have wrested the Scriptures to their own destruction?
Evidence of History
That Christ has kept His promise to safeguard His Church is abundantly clear from the long, triumphant history of the one clearly defined and divinely instituted Church that has existed from apostolic times-the Catholic Church. From the time of its establishment, this Church has met violence, hatred and opposition from every power, both civil and religious, on earth. It asked the Jews to abandon agelong hopes. The Scribes and Pharisees amongst them had been called a 'brood of vipers and 'whited sepulchres and accused of pride, hypocrisy, cruelty and injustice. Would they be likely to let Christianity flourish if they could stifle it? Yet 3000 people were baptized in Jerusalem itself, the very city in which Christ had been crucified as a malefactor only fifty days earlier. In a few years, a former Jew could write: 'Verily their sound has gone forth into all the earth and their words unto the ends of the whole world (Rom. 10: 18). Saul, the zealous Pharisee who hated Christianity and tried to suppress it, was himself converted and became Paul the ardent apostle who soon could say: 'I have suffered the loss of all things and count them as nothing that I may gain Christ.
This Church was in deadly conflict with the paganism of the time. It demanded that the proud Romans sacrifice their pride, their vices and their gods and bow down in adoration before a member of the despised and conquered Jewish race who had died like a criminal on a cross. The greatest power in the world, the mighty Roman Empire, tried to crush it. Its first leaders, the apostles, were cruelly tortured and done to death. Under ten savage persecutions, thousands of Christians suffered every year at Rome alone. Some of them were crucified like Christ Himself. Groups of them were slaughtered by the sword, many were thrown to the wild beasts in the amphitheatre to be mangled and torn to pieces to provide sport for the pagans of the city of Rome. Some of them were smeared with pitch and set on fire at night in the arena to provide a spectacle for the crowd. Eyes were burnt out, tongues cut out, limbs broken on the rack. Mothers were forced to watch their children tortured and cut to pieces. They suffered and died gladly rather than renounce by one word or gesture their faith in Christ, Who meant so much to them. . . . The blood of martyrs became the seed of Christians and in 300 years the Roman Empire itself was won to Christianity. How could it have succeeded-an infant Church against a giant empire- unless it had been divine? . . . unless Christ had kept His promise: 'I am with you all days even to the consummation of the world? All the fury of hell seemed to be let loose against them, but Christ had promised: 'the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
For a thousand years, the might of that militant Islam known as Mahommedanism was thrust against the Church in an attempt to crush her, but finally subsided to leave the Church unconquered and unconquerable. Down through the centuries, the world the flesh and the devil have combined in an attempt to overthrow the Church of God. A human institution, if it had ever begun to develop against such tremendous odds, would soon have perished. Century after century she has met new attacks, but each new blow has only served to purify and strengthen her. Peter, her first leader, was crucified on the Vatican Hill in Rome. Today, Peter's successor, from that same Vatican Hill, receives the willing obedience of hundreds of millions of devoted subjects from all parts of the world.
Physical violence failed to stop her progress. Intellectual attack failed, too, as Gnostics, Manicheans, Donatists, Arians and Pelagians tried to supplant God's scheme with a better scheme of their own. We have lived to see the disintegration and decomposition of the greatest of modern heresies-Protestantism. As new foes prepare to meet her-Rationalism, Modernism, Communism-the Church of God stands secure; the gates of hell shall not prevail against her. Almost alone, she raises her voice as men attempt to render to Caesar the things that are God's and strike at the very root of Christian life by defiling the sanctity of marriage and the sacredness of human life.
Catholic Church Unique
More and more clearly she stands out as 'the pillar and the ground of truth, the 'house built on a rock, 'the city set on a hill, the 'one fold under one shepherd, the tiny mustard seed grown to an immense tree.
She alone in the face of every foe fearlessly safeguards the teaching of Christ. She alone numbers amongst her subjects children of every age and race, colour and custom, language and political creed. Her members differ amongst themselves on all things except the one thing that, on the authority of God matters most, the knowledge, love and service of God. She alone possesses that unity of belief, worship and government that distinguishes her from all man-made institutions. She alone traces her history, her teaching and her worship in proud, unbroken line to Christ.
She alone numbers amongst her children those who leave home, friends and worldly possessions to follow Christ; to consecrate themselves body and soul by vows of poverty, chastity and obedience to the service of God and their fellowmen. She alone welcomes to her fold year after year hundreds of thousands of men and women whose conversion often means misunderstanding, loss of friends and sometimes the loss of everything. They have found the pearl of great price; they give all they possess to secure it.
Each year sees an increase in the number of conversions to the Catholic Church in almost every land. In the U.S.A. more than 100,000 adult non-Catholics have been received into the Catholic Church on each of the past three years. In England, some 11,000 converts are baptized each year. In Australia, converts are instructed and received into the Church each year in almost every parish throughout the Commonwealth.
Are the converts to the Catholic Church only simple, uneducated people who have been fooled by sly priests, as is sometimes suggested? They include many ministers of non-Catholic denominations, university professors, prominent men and women from the world of science and literature, people of every walk of life. Why did they become Catholics? Only because, after studying the claims of the Catholic Church and praying earnestly to God for light, they have realized that they could not be anything else. Cardinal Newman, when charged with being a traitor to the Church of England, or trying to do something sensational replied: 'I have a good name with many; I am deliberately sacrificing it. I have a bad name with more; I am fulfilling all their worst wishes and giving them their most coveted triumph. I am distressing all I love, unsettling all I have instructed or aided. I am going to those whom I do not know, and of whom I expect very little. I am making myself an outcast, and that at my age-Oh! what can it be but stern necessity which causes this. (Letter to his sister, 15th March, 1845.) What else but stern necessity could have brought into the Catholic Church Robert Hugh Benson, son of the primate of the Church of England, the Archbishop of Canterbury, or Ronald Knox, son of an Anglican Bishop, or those hundreds of ministers who have lost their only means of living and their oldest and best friends who could not understand?
What kind of Catholics do they become? Often they put to shame those who have had the faith from the cradle. An American convert, Dorothy Fremont Grant,has written in her book: 'What Other Answer?: 'After almost eight years, I still see many Catholics whom I would like to shake until their teeth rattle-because they are so careless with the precious gift of faith. Of the day of her conversion, she wrote: 'What I did today is just as final as committing suicide. If I fail the fault will be mine, for God is never wrong. She knew she had found God in the Catholic Church, Augustine Roth, a former Baptist minister and author of 'Out of the Wilderness, wrote: 'There are no more doubts, no more fears, no more empty, meaningless sects; I have found the Father's house.
What have they found in the Catholic Church? This is what John L. Stoddard wrote in 'Rebuilding a Lost Faith: 'This one, holy, apostolic Church has given me certainty for doubt, order for confusion, sunlight for darkness and substance for shadow. . . . Favoured are those who from their childhood up are nurtured in the Catholic Church and to whom all her comforts, aids and sacraments come no less freely than the air and sunshine. Yet I have sometimes wondered whether such favoured Catholics ever know the rapture of the homeless waif to whom the splendours of his Father's house are suddenly revealed; the consolation of the mariner whose storm-tossed vessel finally attains the sheltered port; the gratitude of the lonely wanderer, long lost in cold and darkness, who shares at last, however undeservedly, the warmth and light of God's great Spiritual Home. A Professor of Liberal Arts at the University of Washington, Dr. Herbert E. Cory, like so many others, has only one regret-why did he delay so long: 'As I look backward over the years, I am often amazed and annoyed at the obstinacy with which in the face of innumerable and unusual opportunities, I resisted the truth. . . . It was not until the day of my first Holy Communion that I found I had attained, for the first time, to what in the strictest sense of the word may be termed happiness in contrast with mere pleasure ('The Emancipation of a Freethinker).
Are They Satisfied?
Are they satisfied with what they have found? Listen to what Penrose Fry, a former Anglican Minister, wrote in 'The Church Surprising: 'I ask of God no other grace than this, that I may spend the days on earth that are mine as her devout and loving son, as devout and loving to her as she, the one, holy, Catholic, apostolic and Roman Church is a sweet and loving mother to me; and that when I come to die, I may do so with her tender arms around me, her prayers about me, her Sacraments within me and that faith and hope mid security in my heart which she alone possesses and she alone can teach.
Maurice Baringwrote in 1922: 'I was received into the Church on the Eve of Candlemas, 1909, and it is perhaps the only act in my life which I am quite certain I have never regretted. Every day I live, the Church seems to me more and more solemn and sustaining; the voice of the Church, her liturgy, her rules and her discipline, her ritual, her decisions in matters of Faith and Morals more and more excellent and profoundly wise and true and right, and her children stamped with something that those outside her are without. There I have found truth and reality and everything outside her is to me compared with her as dust and shadow.
John Henry Newman , who as an Anglican minister in perplexity and doubt wrote the beautiful 'Lead Kindly Light, could write after being a Catholic for more than thirty years: 'I have been in perfect peace and contentment; I have never had one doubt. . . . It was like coming into port after a rough sea. and my happiness on that score remains to this day without interruption. In 1862, he wrote to the 'Globe newspaper in answer to those who continued to say that he was not that happy as a Catholic: 'I have not had one moment's wavering of trust in the Catholic Church ever since I was received into her fold. I hold, and ever have held, that her Sovereign Pontiff is the centre of unity and the Vicar of Christ; and I have ever had, and have still, an unclouded faith in her creed in all its articles; a supreme satisfaction in her worship, discipline and teaching; and an eager longing, and a hope against hope that the many dear friends whom I have left in Protestantism may be partakers of my happiness.
Of his conversion, Chestertonwrote: 'I have sometimes put it to myself, as something between a melancholy meditation and a joke: 'Where should I go now if I did leave the Catholic Church?' . . . I could no more go back than a man who has regained his sanity could go back to the padded cell. Dom Bede Camm wrote in 'Anglican Memories; 'Every succeeding year has brought increasing gladness and growing thankfulness to Him Who thus wondrously led us out of the City of Confusion into the City of Peace.
To become a Catholic does not mean entering some strange religious organization; the convert to the Catholic Church comes to that spiritual home where he would have been all along had it not been for the Protestant Reformation. We all belong to one Heavenly Father; why should we be different?We all long for unity; God Himself wills it. May men's anxiety 'about the effrontery with which the united front of militant atheism advances strengthen the resolution of all, Catholic and non-Catholic alike, to strive unceasingly towards a realization of Our Lord's own prayer: 'that they all may be one, as You Father in Me and I in You, that they all may be one in us and the world may believe that You have sent Me. Let all pray earnestly and perseveringly that thewill of God may be done: 'Other sheep I have that are not of this fold; them also I must bring and they shall hear My voice and there shall be one fold and one shepherd,
W. M. COLLINS,
@ D. MANNIX,
Archiepiscopus Melbournensis. 1951
Copyright 1999-2023 Catholic Support Services all rights reserved