SS. ABDON AND SENNEN, MM.
THEY were Persians, but coming to Rome,
courageously confessed the faith of Christ in the persecution of
Decius in 250. They were cruelly tormented, but the more their bodies
were mangled and covered with ghastly wounds, the more were their
souls adorned and beautified with divine grace, and rendered glorious
in the sight of heaven. The Christians at Rome did not treat them as
strangers, but as brethren united to them in the hope of the same
blessed country; and after their death carefully deposited their
bodies in the house of a subdeacon called Quirinus. In the reign of
Constantine the Great, their relics were removed into the ancient
burying place of Pontian, so called from some rich man who built it:
called also, from some sign, Ad Ursum Pileatum. It afterward received
its name from SS. Abdon and Sennen. It was situated near the Tiber,
on the road to Porto near the gates of Rome. The images of these
martyrs with Persian bonnets and crowns on their heads, and their
names, are to be seen there at this day in ancient sculpture.1 SS.
Abdon and Sennen are mentioned in the ancient Liberian Calendar, and
in other Martyrologies; though their modern acts deserve no notice,
as cardinal Noris has demonstrated.2
The martyrs preferred torments and death to sin,
because the love of God above all things reigned in their breasts.
“We say we are Christians,” says Tertullian;3 “we
proclaim it to the whole world, even under the hands of the
executioner, and in the midst of all the torments you inflict upon us
to compel us to unsay it. Torn and mangled, and weltering in our
blood, we cry out as loud as we are able to cry, That we are
worshippers of God through Christ.” Upon which Mr. Reeves
observes, that no other religion ever produced any considerable
number of martyrs except the true one. Do we ever read of any
generation of men so greedy of martyrdom, who thought it long till
they were upon the rack, and were so patient, so cheerful and
steadfast under the most intolerable torments? Socrates was the only
philosopher that can be said to have died for his doctrine; and what
a restless posture of mind does he betray, who was esteemed the best
and the wisest of the heathens! With what misgivings, and fits of
hope and fear, does he deliver himself in that most famous discourse,
supposed to have been made by him a little before his death, about a
future state!4 And neither Phædo, Cebes, Crito, Simmias, nor
any other of his greatest friends who were present at his death,
durst maintain either his innocence, or that doctrine for which he
died, in the Areopagus. With what reserve did Plato himself dogmatize
concerning the gods whom he worshipped in public, but denied in
private! How did he dodge about, disguise himself, and say and unsay
the same excellent truths! Only the Christians suffered at this rate,
and they held or suffering for several hundred years together, till
they had subdued the world by dying for their religion. What could
engage such a number of men in such a religion, and support them in
it, in defiance of death in the most shocking forms, but evident
truth, and a superior grace and strength from above?